Dan J. Harkey

Master Educator | Business & Finance Consultant | Mentor

Taxation, Coercion, Institutional Theft- Complete Version

Understanding Taxation, Coercion, Institutional Theft, and the Economic Treadmill: A Historical Analysis of Power

by Dan J. Harkey

Share This Article

Introduction: The Shift from ‘Public Revenue’ To ‘Private Rents’

Political orders justify taxation as necessary for “public goods.” Yet, History repeatedly shows how revenue systems morph into engines of coercion, class privilege, class divide, and state-enforced redistribution to the powerful.  From Roman tax farmers to modern bailouts, the mechanism is consistent: compliance is backed by force; rules are written by those who benefit; the costs are socialized onto workers via taxation, inflation, and debt.  This historical pattern, when illuminated, can provide a profound understanding of the issue.

1) Taxation as Institutionalized Taking: From Rome to the Early Modern State

Roman Republic and Empire (tax farming and coercion).
In the late Republic, publicani (private contractors) bid for the right to collect taxes in provinces.  Their profits depended on over-collection and intimidation; provincials faced dispossession if they resisted.  Cicero’s correspondence and the historian Polybius both describe the abuses and the political Corruption around tax farming.  The state’s extraction was “legal,” but its on-the-ground application was indistinguishable from organized plunder.

Medieval and Early Modern monarchies.
Crown debts routinely led to extraordinary levies, “loans,” and forced expropriations.  English kings pawned royal prerogative for cash, then squeezed towns and trade.  The infamous French gabelle (salt tax) and taille (a direct tax) funded dynastic wars; resistance brought confiscation, imprisonment, and press-gangs.  Taxation may have worn a legal mask, but enforcement always arrived with soldiers and sheriffs.

Magna Carta (1215): a reluctant curb on arbitrary exactions.
Barons compelled King John to acknowledge that taxation requires consent—an early recognition that, without constraints, fiscal power becomes legalized theft.  This emphasis on consent in taxation is a powerful reminder of the rights of the people and can empower the audience in their role in the system.

Core lesson: Whether delegated to private collectors or centralized in bureaucracies, taxation historically has leaned toward coercion rather than consent.  The more distant the taxpayer is from the bargaining table, the more predatory the regime becomes.

2) Compliance and Brute Force: The Case Studies of Rebellion

The English Civil Wars (1642–1651).
Fiscal disputes—ship money, forced loans, customs—helped precipitate constitutional conflict.  The Crown’s insistence on revenue without parliamentary consent, backed by coercion, catalyzed a war that redefined sovereignty and the legitimacy of taxation.

The American Revolution (1765–1783).
“Taxation without representation” was not a quibble about pennies; it was a moral assertion that extraction without consent is tyranny.  This moral assertion, a cornerstone of the American Revolution, can inspire the audience with the principles of justice and fairness.

The Whiskey Rebellion (1794).
After independence, the new federal government imposed an excise on distilled spirits—falling hardest on small frontier producers.  When farmers resisted, President Washington mustered a militia force of ~13,000 to enforce compliance.  In a young republic born of an anti-tax revolt, revenue still arrived with armed men.  The pattern is perennial: Law makes it legal; the musket makes it happen.

3) Workers Earn; Predators Forage: When the State Mimics a Syndicate

The French corvée and seigneurial dues.
Peasants owed labor and rents to lords and the Crown—extracted through legal privilege and enforced by courts and gendarmes.  Labor’s output was voluntary; the levy was not.  When harvests failed, obligations did not.

Ottoman and Mamluk tax farming.
The iltizam (farming out the right to collect revenue) replicated the Roman playbook: politically connected elites purchased fiscal privileges and squeezed the countryside.  The state outsourced coercion but pocketed the legitimacy—and a slice of the proceeds.

Bastiat’s “legal plunder.”
Frédéric Bastiat argued that when the Law is used to take from some to give to others, the moral character of theft is not altered by statute.  The state can—and often does—operate like a cartel, sanctioning transfers that would be criminal if performed privately.

4) Two-Tier Rulemaking: Wealth Writes the Rules; Workers Obey Them

Mercantilism and chartered monopolies (16th–18th centuries).
Crown-chartered companies (e.g., the East India Companies) received tax privileges, trade exclusivity, and armed enforcement.  Workers and small traders faced customs, navigation acts, and guild barriers.  Profits were privatized; losses—wars to protect monopolies—were socialized through taxation.

The Corn Laws (1815–1846).
British landowners engineered tariffs to keep grain prices high, enriching themselves at the expense of workers’ real wages.  The Anti–Corn Law League’s argument was straightforward: regulation was a transfer from labor to the landed class, enforced by the state.

Gilded Age and Progressive Era regulatory capture.
Railroad and utility regulation often entrenched incumbents.  The Interstate Commerce Commission was created to restrain railroads, but it frequently ended up protecting them from rate competition.  Rules written by “experts” drifted toward the interests of the regulated giants—an early modern template for today’s rule by lobbyists.

5) Privatized Profits, Socialized Losses: Bailouts, War Finance, and Monetary Regimes

War finance and the inflation tax.
From the Continental Congress’s issuance of “Continentals” to assignats in Revolutionary France and greenbacks during the U.S. Civil War, governments turned to paper emissions that diluted purchasing power.  Inflation is taxation by other means—disguised, unvoted, and regressive.  Bondholders and contractors were shielded; wage earners paid.

Roosevelt’s 1933 Gold seizure and devaluation.
Executive Order 6102 compelled Americans to surrender Gold at a statutory price, after which the dollar was devalued.  That transfer advantaged the sovereign debtor and its banking system while socializing the real cost across savers and wage earners—again, a coerced rearrangement of balance sheets.

Bretton Woods → the 1971 Nixon shock.
Once the dollar’s Gold convertibility ended, monetary discipline yielded to discretionary policy.  Credit cycles, asset booms, and recurrent inflation redistributed wealth toward asset holders and leveraged institutions.  Workers, paid in nominal dollars, ran faster to stay in place.

Too Big to Fail: The modern template.
In crises, large financial institutions receive liquidity, guarantees, and bailouts; the public inherits the debts and the inflationary aftermath.  This is the quintessential “privatize gains, socialize losses” cycle.  Taxes, deficits, and currency debasement finance the rescue; the treadmill steepens for ordinary households.

6) Channels of Power: Banking, Media, Lawfare, Rulemaking

Banking and central credit.
Control over the cost and availability of credit redistributes quietly but massively.  Credit booms elevate asset prices owned by the wealthy; policy backstops cushion busts.  Workers own fewer assets and bear the costs of job and wage volatility.

Narrative management.
From mercantilist pamphleteers to modern legacy media tied to corporate and political interests, the story sold to the public rationalizes transfer schemes as “stability,” “national security,” or “prudence.” The frame legitimizes coercion.

Lawfare and compliance costs.
Complex codes, administered by expert bureaucracies and enforced through fines and litigation, create a moat around entrenched players.  Prominent actors can hire compliance teams; small enterprises and workers cannot.  What cannot be defeated in markets can be defeated in rulemaking.

7) The Inflation Treadmill: A Hidden Tax on Workers

Price controls and shortages (20th century).
From wartime rationing to peacetime price controls, attempts to treat symptoms rather than causes tend to reduce real wages and choice.  Meanwhile, assets (land, equities) are appreciated relative to cash incomes, rewarding the already-capitalized.

Bracket creep and payroll taxation.
Inflation pushes workers into higher nominal tax brackets and amplifies payroll tax burdens; the real take-home pay shrinks even as the sticker wage rises.  By contrast, sophisticated capital income can be shielded, deferred, or recharacterized.

Debt dependence as a policy outcome.
When purchasing power erodes, households turn to credit for essentials—feeding fee streams to lenders and creating path dependence on the very financial architecture that benefits from monetary dilution.

8) Objections and Replies

“But public goods need taxes.”
True: defense, courts, and core infrastructure require funding.  The critique is not that no revenue should ever be raised, but that coercion, opacity, and capture dominate how it is raised and spent.  Voluntary mechanisms (user fees, mutuals, localism, competitive federalism, transparent consent) are historically underused.  Where taxation exists, strict constitutional constraints, simple tax bases, and hard budget limits are morally superior to baroque codes and off–balance sheet inflation.

“Democracy legitimizes taxation.”
Only if consent is meaningful, information is transparent, and exit is feasible.  When districts are gerrymandered, rules are written by lobbyists, and money-printing sidesteps legislative debate, the consent claim is performative.  The historical record shows that elites repeatedly weaponize fiscal machinery even under electoral regimes.

9) Toward an Honest Political Economy

  • Simplicity: Broad bases, low rates, no carve-outs—deny rent-seekers their leverage.
  • Transparency: Put the actual cost of programs on budget; end the inflation tax as covert finance.
  • Hard constraints: Debt brakes, sunset clauses, and constitutional limits on emergency finance.
  • Decentralization and exit: Competing jurisdictions discipline predation; people should be able to vote with their feet.
  • Rule of Law for all: End the two-tier system of privilege and impunity; abolish “too big to fail.”

10) The Role Of Central Banks

Central banks play a pivotal role in the modern economic system, and their influence ties directly into the themes you’ve raised—coercion, wealth asymmetry, and the financial treadmill.

11)  Origins and Purpose

Central banks were initially created to:

  • Stabilize currency and prevent bank runs.
  • Act as a lender of last resort during financial crises.
  • Manage government debt and facilitate war finance (historically a major driver).

Over time, their mandate expanded to include:

  • Monetary policy (controlling interest rates and money supply).
  • Inflation targeting (keeping prices “stable”).
  • Financial system oversight.

12)  Mechanisms of Control

Central banks exert power through:

  • Interest Rate Policy: By raising or lowering rates, they influence borrowing, spending, and investment.  Low rates often inflate asset prices, benefiting the wealthy.
  • Open Market Operations: Buying and selling government securities to inject or withdraw liquidity.
  • Reserve Requirements: Dictating how much commercial banks must hold, shaping credit availability.
  • Quantitative Easing (QE): Large-scale asset purchases that flood markets with liquidity—primarily benefiting financial institutions and asset holders.

13)  The Hidden Tax: Inflation

When central banks expand the money supply faster than productivity grows, purchasing power erodes.  This acts as:

  • A covert tax on savers and wage earners.
  • A wealth transfer to debtors and asset owners, since real debt burdens shrink while asset prices rise.

Historically:

  • Weimar Germany (1920s): Hyperinflation wiped out middle-class savings.
  • 1970s U.S.: Loose monetary policy contributed to stagflation.
  • Post-2008 QE: Asset prices soared, enriching the top decile while wages stagnated.

14)  Central Banks and the Wealthy Class

  • Privatized Profits, Socialized Losses: During crises (2008, 2020), central banks bailed out large institutions, while ordinary taxpayers absorbed the long-term costs through debt and inflation.
  • Policy Capture: Decisions often favor financial markets over Main Street.  Asset inflation benefits those with capital; wage earners face rising living costs.

15)  Channels of Power

Central banks are not isolated technocracies—they interact with:

  • Government fiscal policy: Monetizing deficits through bond purchases.
  • Global finance: Coordinating with other central banks (e.g., Fed, ECB, BOJ) to manage liquidity.
  • Regulatory frameworks: Setting rules that often entrench large financial players.

16)  Critiques from Hayek, Mises, and Bastiat

  • Hayek warned that discretionary monetary policy distorts price signals, leading to malinvestment and boom-bust cycles.
  • Mises: Saw inflationary finance as a stealth expropriation of wealth.
  • Bastiat: Would classify inflationary policy as “legal plunder”—a transfer masked by Law and complexity.

17)  Why It Matters for the Economic Treadmill

Workers earn in nominal wages, but:

  • Inflation erodes real income.
  • Asset inflation prices them out of housing and investment.
  • Credit dependence deepens, feeding interest streams to banks

Conclusion: Breaking the Machine

·        From Rome’s tax farmers to modern central banking and bailouts, the pattern is stable: compliance rests on force; rules serve the connected; costs are socialized onto workers through taxation, inflation, and debt.  The result is a treadmill—faster steps for the many, smoother rides for the few.  A civilization that wants liberty must invert the defaults: constrain the fiscal state, simplify the code, harden the money, and restore consent to the center of political economy.

·       Meanwhile, the wealthy leverage cheap credit to acquire appreciating assets, compounding inequality.