Dan J. Harkey

Master Educator | Business & Finance Consultant | Mentor

The Federal Government’s War on Individual Accountability and Self-Reliance

America was built on principles of hard work, personal responsibility, and self-reliance. Yet today, those values are under siege—not by foreign adversaries, but by our own federal government. Through an ever-expanding web of transfer payments, Washington has created a culture of dependency that not only threatens economic vitality but also individual freedom. This erosion of liberty is a cause for concern and should spur us to action.

by Dan J. Harkey

Share This Article

Summary

Discussions in Washington, DC, about solutions always end up with extracting more money from the productive class, which will help the dependent and parasite classes. Somehow, rationalizing that paying people enough to take care of necessities like housing, food, medical, and education, and providing extra for discretionary spending, will somehow drive the economic engine and add to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

The federal apparatus, meaning federal workers, is happy to have a job extracting tax dollars and reallocating the proceeds to the dependent class.  That’s quite a gig.

1.  Federal Transfer Payments at an All-Time High

Federal transfer payments—cash or benefits provided without requiring goods or services in return—are now at historic levels.  These programs were initially designed as safety nets for the vulnerable.  Today, they have morphed into sprawling entitlement systems that touch nearly every aspect of American life.

2.  Little Oversight, Rampant Waste

Qualification standards are weak, enforcement is minimal, and fraud is pervasive.  Billions of taxpayer dollars are wasted, abused, and lost to outright scams each year.  Yet Congress continues to expand these programs with little regard for accountability.

3.  A Nation on the Dole

Between 60% and 70% of Americans receive some form of federal transfer payment.  This is not a safety net—it’s a dependency trap.  When the majority of citizens rely on government checks, the incentive to work, innovate, and produce erodes.

4.  What Are Federal Transfer Payments?

These payments redistribute income and wealth without requiring the exchange of goods or services.

They fall into two major categories:

Social Insurance Programs

  • Retirement & Disability: Social Security benefits, federal pensions, veterans’ benefits.
  • Health Insurance: Medicare for the elderly and disabled.
  • Unemployment: Unemployment insurance benefits.

Welfare & Assistance Programs

  • Health Assistance: Medicaid for low-income individuals.
  • Nutrition Assistance: SNAP (food stamps), school meals.
  • Income & Housing Assistance: SSI, TANF, housing aid, LIHEAP.
  • Education & Training: Pell Grants, job-training subsidies.
  • Tax Credits: Refundable credits like EITC and Child Tax Credit.

5.  Other Federal Transfers

  • Grants-in-Aid: Federal funds to states for infrastructure, education, and health care.
  • Disaster Relief: Payments during crises or natural disasters.

This list is far from exhaustive—new programs and temporary relief efforts appear constantly.

6.  The Real Problem: Incentives Destroyed

The most alarming trend is the growing number of non-disabled, working-age Americans who view government benefits as a lucrative retirement plan.  This perverse incentive structure rewards idleness and punishes productivity, undermining the very principles on which America was built.

The Consequences

  • Shrinking labor force participation.
  • Ballooning federal debt.
  • Cultural erosion of self-reliance.

Historical Trends in Federal Transfer Payments

Federal transfer payments have grown dramatically over the past eight decades, both in absolute terms and as a share of GDP:

  • 1947: $11 billion in transfer payments—virtually negligible compared to GDP.
  • 1960: Transfers accounted for about 3.7% of GDP, primarily Social Security and modest welfare programs.
  • 1980: Rapid expansion due to Medicare and Medicaid; transfers reached ~10% of GDP.
  • 2000: Transfers climbed to $1.03 trillion, about 12% of GDP.
  • 2008–2009 (Great Recession): Stimulus and unemployment benefits pushed transfers to $1.89 trillion and 14.4% of GDP.
  • 2020–2021 (COVID-19): Unprecedented surge—over $6.1 trillion annualized at peak, exceeding 25% of GDP during emergency relief.
  • 2024: Transfers stabilized at $4.4 trillion, still nearly 19% of GDP, far above historical norms. ,

Long-Term Pattern

  • From under 4% of GDP in 1960 to nearly 20% today, transfer payments have become the dominant component of federal spending.
  • Entitlement programs (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid) and refundable tax credits now consume over half of all federal outlays.

Historical Trends in Labor Force Participation

The labor force participation rate (LFPR)—the share of the civilian population aged 16+ that is working or actively seeking work—has shifted dramatically over the past 75 years:

  • 1948: Around 58%, reflecting a post-war economy with fewer women in the workforce.
  • 1950s–1960s: Gradual rise as women entered the labor market; rate hovered near 60–61%.
  • 1970: About 60.4%, beginning a sharp climb driven by baby boomers and women’s workforce participation.
  • 1980: Reached 64%, continuing upward momentum.
  • 1990: Around 66%, near historic highs.
  • 2000: 67.3%, the all-time peak.
  • 2010: Declined to 64.7%, impacted by aging demographics and the Great Recession.
  • 2020: Fell to 61.7% during COVID-19 disruptions.
  • 2025: Stabilized near 62.3%, well below the peak two decades earlier.  

Prime-Age Participation (Ages 25–54)

  • Historically more stable, ranging from ~80% in the 1950s to 83–84% today, but still below pre-2008 levels.
  • Key Drivers of Change
  • Demographics: An aging population reduces the overall LFPR.
  • Social Shifts: Women’s entry into the workforce drove gains from 1960 to 1990.
  • Economic Shocks: Recessions and pandemics caused sharp declines.
  • Policy & Incentives: Expanding transfer payments and disability programs have discouraged work for some groups.

Here are key policy solutions to address excessive federal transfer payments, drawn from recent expert analyses, legislative proposals, and agency recommendations:

1.  Reform Entitlement and Welfare Program Structures

A. Reinstate and Expand Work Requirements

  • Require non-disabled adults to work, volunteer, or pursue education/training to receive benefits (e.g., 80 hours/month under recent proposals).
  • Close loopholes in programs like SNAP and Medicaid that allow waivers without valid cause.

B. Reduce “Benefit Cliffs”

  • Implement transitional benefits that phase out gradually as income rises, avoiding sudden loss of support that discourages work.

C. Consolidate Duplicative Programs

  • Over 80 anti-poverty programs exist across 15+ agencies.  Streamlining these would reduce waste and improve oversight.

2.  Improve Program Integrity and Fraud Prevention

A. Strengthen Prepayment Verification

  • Require identity and eligibility checks before disbursing funds, especially in emergency programs.

B. Expand Use of Data Analytics

  • Cross-check welfare enrollment against wage records, incarceration data, death records, and out-of-state spending.
  • Use AI and predictive analytics to detect fraud patterns across agencies.

C. Enforce Accountability

  • Agencies should publish corrective action plans and reduction targets for improper payments under the Payment Integrity Information Act (PIIA).

3.  Modernize Payment Systems

A. Transition to Digital Payments

  • Mandate electronic funds transfers (EFTs) for all federal disbursements to reduce fraud and administrative costs.
  • Paper checks cost taxpayers over $657 million annually and are 16x more likely to be lost or stolen.

4.  Fiscal Discipline and Budgetary Reform

A. Cap Transfer Payment Growth

  • Tie growth of transfer programs to inflation or GDP, not political cycles or emergency declarations.

B. Sunset Temporary Programs

  • Require expiration dates and performance reviews for new or emergency transfer programs to prevent permanent expansion.

C. Broaden Tax Base and Reduce Dependency

  • Combine spending cuts with tax reforms to reduce deficits without harming economic growth.

Closing Thoughts

The federal government’s expansive system of transfer payments—once a targeted safety net—has evolved into a sprawling entitlement regime that undermines the very principles of personal responsibility and economic self-reliance.  While these programs serve vital roles for the truly vulnerable, their unchecked growth, poor oversight, and misaligned incentives have created a culture of dependency that weakens labor force participation and strains public finances. Reform is not only possible—it is essential.  By restoring work incentives, tightening eligibility, modernizing delivery systems, and enforcing fiscal discipline, policymakers can realign federal assistance with its original purpose: empowering individuals to thrive rather than subsidizing disengagement.   The time to act is now, because temporary fixes have become permanent liabilities.